Has Q chucked it?

Thought this was a piss take at first but no, it seems Mr. Dilbert really has fallen down the Q hole.
He'll soon be warning us not to play Judas Priest backwards. :lol:

He also comes out with this beauty:
“Did you know if you took the capital letter J—just imagine the capital letter J in your mind—now think of the next letter in ‘Joe.’ It’s an O. Now just move with your mind the O to the left until it’s on top of the J. It’s a backward six. Now suppose the next letter is the lowercase E. What does a lowercase E look like if you turn it upside down? Well, it looks like a six. So you’ve got the J and O together. If you combine them it looks like a backward six. You’ve got this lowercase E that looks like an upside-down six, but that’s just two sixes. Six, six wouldn’t mean anything, right? But the next letter is capital B for Biden, and capital B is where you hide your six. So even J-O-E-B is 666.”

By that logic Joe Brown, Joe Baker and Joe Bananas are all the devil. :confused:

The whole video is here. Relatively sane until about 28 and a half minutes in when the "satanic coincidences" woowoo starts.
 
Thought this was a piss take at first but no, it seems Mr. Dilbert really has fallen down the Q hole.
He'll soon be warning us not to play Judas Priest backwards. :lol:

He also comes out with this beauty:


By that logic Joe Brown, Joe Baker and Joe Bananas are all the devil. :confused:

The whole video is here. Relatively sane until about 28 and a half minutes in when the "satanic coincidences" woowoo starts.

He must be a relative new convert to the conservative side. These sort of conspiracy theories about a Republican president (or candidate) being the literal devil has been around since at least the Reagan administration. The Reagan is the devil one was probably the loudest, but they also targeted both Bush's.
 
He must be a relative new convert to the conservative side.
From memory, he came out as pro-Trump in 2016, before he was elected. However, I am happy to concede that being pro-Trump does not necessarily make anyone a conservative.
On the other hand he does appear to be a relatively new convert to Q-flavoured numerology, symbolism, satanic conspiracy theories and general moon-howling bampottery.
 
From memory, he came out as pro-Trump in 2016, before he was elected. However, I am happy to concede that being pro-Trump does not necessarily make anyone a conservative.
On the other hand he does appear to be a relatively new convert to Q-flavoured numerology, symbolism, satanic conspiracy theories and general moon-howling bampottery.

In defense of Scott Adams, not everything he has said is wrong even though he was attacked for it at the time. He correctly predicted Republicans would be hunted down in the street, and Biden hasn't even been elected (yet?).

Eb3WHTwWkAAXuz-.jpg

The media is framing it as a generic "one dead in clash", except there was no clash. He was executed simply walking down the street. This is not an isolated event.

 
From memory, he came out as pro-Trump in 2016, before he was elected. However, I am happy to concede that being pro-Trump does not necessarily make anyone a conservative.
On the other hand he does appear to be a relatively new convert to Q-flavoured numerology, symbolism, satanic conspiracy theories and general moon-howling bampottery.
I'm not sure that he is, but he does like to float balloons. I doubt that he thinks these things but he is looking to plant things in minds that might.
 
I doubt that he thinks these things but he is looking to plant things in minds that might.

It's one thing being ignorant enough to believe such woowoo, but if he's the type of person to play on the gullible by encouraging them towards nonsense like satanic numerology and symbolism, then he's as much of an arsehole as any faith healer.
 
It's one thing being ignorant enough to believe such woowoo, but if he's the type of person to play on the gullible by encouraging them towards nonsense like satanic numerology and symbolism, then he's as much of an arsehole as any faith healer.
I wonder if this has anything to do with the trial balloon Scott seems to be floating:
Trump allies see threat in evangelical support for Biden

Trump is an obvious atheist who transparently panders to the Christians (because that's what politicians do with voting blocks - which is part of the reason I am uncomfortable with the growing numbers of Muslims, because they are at least as nutty as the christians, but I digress) so he has a weakness here with a constituency the Republicans have courted for decades.
 
It's one thing being ignorant enough to believe such woowoo, but if he's the type of person to play on the gullible by encouraging them towards nonsense like satanic numerology and symbolism, then he's as much of an arsehole as any faith healer.
So far as I've seen his commentaries, it's his way to ridicule things.
 
So far as I've seen his commentaries, it's his way to ridicule things.
In the context of either just the "satanic coincidences" section, or the whole 40 minute video, I didn't see it as an attempt at ridicule.
Perhaps too subtle for me.
 
In the context of either just the "satanic coincidences" section, or the whole 40 minute video, I didn't see it as an attempt at ridicule.
Perhaps too subtle for me.
I eh, do have to admit I haven't seen the video.
 
Well, a large percentage of anti-vaxxers are "new age hippies." To me, it seems almost logical that many of the same people would also believe conspiracy theories suggesting that 5G cell towers spread corona virus or that Bill Gates plans to deploy mind control technologies by vaccinating billions of people. These theories do overlap in many ways.
Here's another take on that overlap:
Nazi hippies: when the New Age and Far-Right overlap
1*L7RU9IWSfBppTnEnJ0Wq2w.jpeg
 
Last edited:
I've seen a couple things lately to make me question the media talking points about Qanon that we've seen in this thread. I wonder if the most outlandish statements about them or examples are simply astroturfing. I may have to look into them. This video has nothing that jumps out at me as crazy. A lot of what they are saying, I have said right here for ~15 years. I'm talking about the apparent Q side, not the Liberal Media smears. I don't trust a word of the Liberal Media, they do nothing but lie. The Deep State exists. People are starting to see there is indeed a global ped0phile ring with all the arrests and subsequent "suicidings".

 
I'm not sure that he is, but he does like to float balloons. I doubt that he thinks these things but he is looking to plant things in minds that might.
Could be we're both wrong. I stumbled across this podcast from a year ago which looks at Scott Adams (and rather tenuously links him to Q anon). If what the podcast claims is true, Adams has been a wuwu-believing crackpot since way before Dilbert was a thing.
 
Which one, Jim Watkins or the original 4chan one (forget his name)?

The Qanon movement in general. I've heard the movement itself called just Q. I don't know the various players yet or 100% proper terminology, but I'm going to look into it. The video I posted above mentions a person called Q+, who some speculate is Trump himself. I find that to be a stretch, but would sure spice things up :lol:
 
The Qanon movement in general. I've heard the movement itself called just Q. I don't know the various players yet or 100% proper terminology, but I'm going to look into it.
Whenever you get around to diving down that rabbit hole, you'll discover the original half dozen or so "Q drops" on 4chan were almost certainly made by different person(s) to the resurrected Q who posts on 8kun (widely believed to be the work of site owner Jim Watkins and friends).
You'll also discover that whenever Q makes a prediction, regardless of which Q it is, it's almost always wrong. Right from the very first Q drop which wrongly claimed Hillary Clinton would be arrested the next morning.
-EDIT-
Here's a screen grab of the first two Q drops:
D8J70kWXsAUnyHG


Needless to say, Q doesn't predict too much nowadays, preferring cryptic messages or copy-paste drivel.
The fun really starts with the "bakers". These "anons" are self appointed interpreters of what Q actually means. They take the cryptic "breadcrumbs" (Qdrops) and "bake" them into fully formed "bread" predictions about all manner of crazy nonsense, often utilising symbolism and numerology.
That's one of the reasons we end up with such wonders as Bill Gates caused 5G cell towers to spread Covid-19 as a smokescreen to vaccinate everyone with tracking chips, secret mass arrests of anyone not right-wing enough, their subsequent executions and replacement clones, ritual eating of the faces of live babies and a time-travelling Lord Trump who is battling satanic forces to save the universe. No Q drop (to my knowledge) specifically said any of these things but some of the "anons" interpreted them that way and spread the gospel.
As for the movement itself, well that's rather murky too. Most of the people I know that have simply fallen for any of the above nonsense have never heard of Q but the ones that are evangelising and peddling it most certainly have.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top