yes, I just can not wait for this
I believe Neil is UPDATING the series - not so much a simple redo - because new science info has since been discovered in the intervening years
If Sagan was alive he would be updating his series.
I believe Neil is UPDATING the series - not so much a simple redo - because new science info has since been discovered in the intervening years
If Sagan was alive he would be updating his series.
I think it's a time warp!Wait - I'm so confused!! Is this a sequel, a remake or a reboot?
all the above in Neil's special sauceWait - I'm so confused!! Is this a sequel, a remake or a reboot?
I think it's a time warp!
I haven't seen gravity (which is typical for me...I have little time for Going To A Theater), but I already heard Tyson complain about the incorrect science in the film.
First of all, it’s a great movie. The pace and story was definitely engaging and I think it was the best use of the 3-D IMAX medium to date. Rather than using the medium as a gimmick, “Gravity” uses it to depict a real environment that is completely alien to most people.
But the question that most people want me to answer is, how realistic was it? The very fact that the question is being asked so earnestly is a testament to the verisimilitude of the movie. When a bad science fiction movie comes out, no one bothers to ask me if it reminded me of the real thing.
The movie does an outstanding job of capturing what it is like to do a spacewalk – much better than any previous sci fi film. Having done three spacewalks myself, I can tell you – this is legit. The visual impact of having nothing but the glass of your helmet between you and the Earth is captured very well.