the UnDemocratic Democratic Primary
I too find the concept of super delegates ridiculous. That said, the Republicans do have "unpledged delegates" that play a similar role. Some states do bind their "unpledged delegates" to the winner of the primary or caucus, but most do not. So, I assume you must find Republicans to be "dim-witted" as well.Are just now finding out about Superdelegates, and the UnDemocratic Democratic Primary.
You may want to watch the follow-up video:JoBBo said
I assume you must find Republicans to be "dim-witted" as well.
Not so much. As most Republicans are smart enough to understand a Republican ballot and the difference between an unpledged delegate (at large), and a pledged delegate (district delegate).
Voicing any criticism about a state branch of the Republican party does not make you a Democract.Unlike the dim-witted Democrat in Fluffy's video above
Again, please watch the follow-up video. The problem is that only votes for the unpledged delegate will be counted because the Ohio Republican party switched to a "winner takes all" scheme but failed to adequately update the forms.who thinks that the Democrat ballot is better because it only gives voters a chance to vote for an unpledged delegate, and no chance to vote for a pledged delegate, the Republican ballot also gives you the choice to vote for a pledged delegate. Most dim-witted Democrats don't understand the concept of freedom of choice.