San Francisco small business regulations

Discussion in 'Politics' started by metalman, Feb 6, 2012.

  1. metalman Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,792
    Likes Received:
    45
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Occupation:
    Engineer
    Location:
    Laredo, TX
    A small business entrepreneur learns about restaurant regulations in San Francisco.



    It is based on the red-tape endured by Juliet Pries, an entrepreneur who decided to open an ice-cream parlor in San Francisco's Cole Valley. She had to pay rent on an empty storefront for over two years while the necessary permits were processed, and tens of thousands of dollars in fees

    Before Ice Cream Shop Can Open, City’s Slow Churn

    If it takes 2 years of paying rent on an empty storefront to get permits to open, that's a lots of overhead to carry considering the average restaurant is only in business for three years :rolleyes: has to be some pricy ice cream to pay for those 2 years.

    Normally if a small business is not open within 3 months after signing a lease ... its out of business
  2. redrumloa Super Moderator

    Member Since:
    Apr 2, 2005
    Message Count:
    4,103
    Likes Received:
    87
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Florida
    This is the Pelosi/Obama model for the rest of the country:finger:
  3. FluffyMcDeath Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    May 17, 2005
    Message Count:
    5,795
    Likes Received:
    503
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Software Developer
    Location:
    Vancouver BC
    Home page:
    Interesting - that video was made by the planning department itself. Seems they are fed up with the tangle of code too.

    This is not just a San Fransisco problem. It is a general problem of "maturity" in any place that produces code. People always like to add code, and they don't like to take out old code and over time it gets harder and harder to navigate the code. Sometimes you just have to get in there with a machete and hack out the dead wood.

    Right now in Vancouver we have a neighbourhood theatre that was a movie theatre but that now, in addition to showing movies, holds live events. A while back they applied to get a liquor license to do two live events a month where they can serve alcohol. All the other nights would be non alcohol events and screenings.

    Now they have the license they are told that this means that they cannot show movies any more. This is ridiculous on its face but you can be pretty sure that all the current license holders that live by the current rules and run their businesses that way are quite happy to not have the rules change. I can imagine that the case is the same for all the currently licensed restaurants and food services in San Fransisco who would cry foul if restrictions were removed to allow more competition for the guys who got their businesses going under the old rules.

Share This Page