Iran, Just In Time Before the Nov Elections?

Discussion in 'World Events in General' started by Dammy, Feb 18, 2012.

  1. Dammy Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Message Count:
    1,385
    Likes Received:
    27
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Tequesta, Florida
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/feb/17/us-officials-iran-sanctions-military-action

    Where is Code Pink at? Mass demonstrations against the chief War Criminal? Oh where oh where is the Progressives at in their silly protest at calling for impeachment for Obama's naked use of military force just at the time of his re-election? Yes, I can hear... awh, just the crickets chirping since the left won't do that to their President in any meaning form. Boy, we know which way those guys go when it's not in their political interest, say it ain't so!
    redrumloa likes this.
  2. FluffyMcDeath Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    May 17, 2005
    Message Count:
    5,787
    Likes Received:
    500
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Software Developer
    Location:
    Vancouver BC
    Home page:
    We marched Feb 4th - in many cities. The liberal media wasn't there. Admittedly, not a big turn out. People don't want to be part of protests these days - don't want to get pepper sprayed, tasered and arrested.

    Were you out protesting - or just listening to the crickets and complaining?
  3. Dammy Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Message Count:
    1,385
    Likes Received:
    27
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Tequesta, Florida
    So what city were you in? RCMP beating you all up that badly? Not sure what the point is of protesting in a different country instead in the one you are protesting.

    I'll go next time as soon as I find the Soros' sponsored PayMaster's email or mobile number. I want my money just like the rest of them, it's a hard day of work after all, I deserve to be treated like the rest and paid for my work.
  4. Robert Super Moderator

    Member Since:
    Apr 1, 2005
    Message Count:
    2,306
    Likes Received:
    231
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Glasgow
    Home page:
    Translation: "No, I wasn't protesting and I probably never will but I'll moan when I think (because I haven't really looked) that no one else is protesting."
  5. Dammy Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Message Count:
    1,385
    Likes Received:
    27
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Tequesta, Florida
    Let me correct your failed translation, "No, I wasn't protesting but I am taking a whiz on all those protesters who had wall to wall media coverage when it was a Republican in the White House who aren't doing squat now that their Progressive Idol is now in the White House doing things that other Progressives threatened to impeach a Republic President if he ever dared to do."

    Funny how VP Biden ducked the media for over a month after Obama got the US into the Libya Civil War without Congressional approval after he had said:

  6. Robert Super Moderator

    Member Since:
    Apr 1, 2005
    Message Count:
    2,306
    Likes Received:
    231
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Glasgow
    Home page:
    Let me correct your failed correction:

    ;)
  7. redrumloa Super Moderator

    Member Since:
    Apr 2, 2005
    Message Count:
    4,103
    Likes Received:
    87
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Florida
    Hmm, why was the liberal media not there? Oh yeah, right, that whole Obama propaganda machine thing...
  8. Robert Super Moderator

    Member Since:
    Apr 1, 2005
    Message Count:
    2,306
    Likes Received:
    231
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Glasgow
    Home page:
    Because anti-war protests are just so.... well, anti-liberal?
    the_leander likes this.
  9. the_leander Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 6, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,212
    Likes Received:
    193
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Occupation:
    Jack of all trades
    Location:
    Kingdom of Mercia (where else)
    Home page:
    Fixed, because the actual liberal media, that being made up of blogs and independent news sites were filled with it.

    Problem is you'd have to peal your eyes away from, as my old English teacher described it, the idiot lantern, to see it.

    And no, the protests weren't as big this time around, simply because a lot of people, having seen the complete non effect of the ones on the run up to the Iraq war, have simply lost faith in the political class and don't believe they'll be listened to.
  10. redrumloa Super Moderator

    Member Since:
    Apr 2, 2005
    Message Count:
    4,103
    Likes Received:
    87
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Florida
    I didn't make the liberal media reference first, just replying ;)

    Why would they just now lose faith? It is not like the Vietnam protests did much good.
  11. the_leander Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 6, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,212
    Likes Received:
    193
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Occupation:
    Jack of all trades
    Location:
    Kingdom of Mercia (where else)
    Home page:
    I think over here at least, the 2003 protests, coupled with all the protests at the cuts coupled with changes in the law and numerous public appearances of MPs dismissing us out of hand have all had a cumulative effect.

    We know we're being shafted and ignored. We just don't know what to do about it.
    Robert likes this.
  12. cecilia Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Message Count:
    2,714
    Likes Received:
    245
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Occupation:
    feeding tube yanker
    Location:
    South Park
    Home page:
    the media may not report it but people ARE protesting and even returning to parks and getting arrested because they have the nerve to Sit Down in a public place.
    I know some people.
  13. faethor Super Moderator

    Member Since:
    Aug 25, 2005
    Message Count:
    3,142
    Likes Received:
    393
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Minneapolis, Minnesota
  14. FluffyMcDeath Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    May 17, 2005
    Message Count:
    5,787
    Likes Received:
    500
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Software Developer
    Location:
    Vancouver BC
    Home page:
  15. Dammy Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Message Count:
    1,385
    Likes Received:
    27
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Tequesta, Florida
    Only when there is a Progressive War Monger as President. Other wise it's just fine and dandy.
  16. Dammy Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Message Count:
    1,385
    Likes Received:
    27
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Tequesta, Florida
    Of course the Progressive Media (ABC/CBS/NBC/NPR/PBS/MSNBC) isn't cover it anymore, it's no longer of political value for Obama.
  17. Robert Super Moderator

    Member Since:
    Apr 1, 2005
    Message Count:
    2,306
    Likes Received:
    231
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Glasgow
    Home page:
    The only way the above sentence could contain any logic is if the mainstream media are liberal (i.e. anti-war) when the POTUS is Republican but when there's a Democrat as president, they are right-wing (i.e. pro-war).

    Is that what you are suggesting?

    From where I'm sitting they're pro-war no matter who is president.

    I agree that there is not enough coverage of anti-war protests but I thought that the last time too. The real reason for this is that war is generally good business for the corporations who own the news outlets that are still ludicrously, absurdly and idiotically referred to as liberal.

    Alan makes a good point too. I marched and protested against the invasion of Iraq.
    I have not marched or protested against an attack on Iran.
    The main reason for this is that there is nowhere near the same level of certainty that Iran will be attacked.
    However, even if it does reach that level, the futlity of the previous protests is still fresh in the minds of many people. Anyone in the UK who was not asleep knew it was trumped up nonsense and the biggest protest ever did nothing to stop it.
    So, maybe I will protest but maybe I won't. We'll see.

    It's no surprise that corporations are almost always in favour of war and it makes their job a whole lot easier when a huge chunk of society can't see beyond the end of their partisan noses.

    On the other hand, for those of us who see war-mongering as something that transcends what team you support, the Democrat-Republican-blame-game-sideshow is simultaneously amusing and depressing.

    It looks to me like you perceive anti-war protests to have been well covered last time because even the teency amount of coverage was too much for you, since the protests were against "your guy" (i.e. a Republican).

    This time, you perceive the teency amount of anti-war coverage as insufficient because it's not enough for you since the protests are against "the other guy" (i.e. a Democrat).
    the_leander likes this.
  18. Glaucus Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Apr 12, 2005
    Message Count:
    2,942
    Likes Received:
    213
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Winnipeg, Canada
    The media also writes obituary articles about well known people before their death as well. Of course you can pile this on to some mountain of evidence for some conspiracy, but really it's not. Everyone knows there's a high probability of war with Iran right now.
  19. FluffyMcDeath Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    May 17, 2005
    Message Count:
    5,787
    Likes Received:
    500
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Software Developer
    Location:
    Vancouver BC
    Home page:
    They didn't carry the other protests either.
  20. FluffyMcDeath Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    May 17, 2005
    Message Count:
    5,787
    Likes Received:
    500
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Software Developer
    Location:
    Vancouver BC
    Home page:
    The media likes to be ahead of the game a little, but doesn't like to waste money on stuff it doesn't need. They ARE a business. Obituaries are a sure thing. Every star will die. However, wars are not so certain. If the networks are throwing resources at a war then they are working under the assumption that there is a high probability. It could be that they are believing their own hype, since they are principles in the messaging advocating for war. They could also have an inside channel. Either way, it doesn't matter, because as an observation it is simply another indicator of the state of readiness and expectation of war.

Share This Page