Gays can now get married in the military

cecilia

Active Member
Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2005
Messages
7,595
Reaction score
2,543
I'm amazed but glad.
of course....
".....a chaplain is not required to participate in or officiate a private ceremony if doing so would be in variance with the tenets of his or her religion."
and
"...provided that the ceremony is not prohibited by applicable state and local law..."
 

metalman

Active Member
Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2005
Messages
10,232
Reaction score
3,006
If tw0 progressives marry in Los Angeles
move to San Fransisco,
then they both get sex change operations,
then they get divorced.

Are they still:

brother and sister?
brothers?
sisters?
 

faethor

Active Member
Moderator
Joined
Aug 25, 2005
Messages
5,144
Reaction score
1,243
Metalman, I think they are a threat to your marriage.
 

Glaucus

Active Member
Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2005
Messages
4,767
Reaction score
697
If tw0 progressives marry in Los Angeles
move to San Fransisco,
then they both get sex change operations,
then they get divorced.

Are they still:

brother and sister?
brothers?
sisters?
Umm... That doesn't make sense. Why don't you just do what you did last time and link us some more of your favorite gay porn?
 

Speelgoedmannetje

Marquis de Bon Vie
Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2005
Messages
1,788
Reaction score
772
If tw0 progressives marry in Los Angeles
move to San Fransisco,
then they both get sex change operations,
then they get divorced.

Are they still:

brother and sister?
brothers?
sisters?
You can only marry within your family in Texas?
 

FluffyMcDeath

Active Member
Member
Joined
May 17, 2005
Messages
12,132
Reaction score
2,624
Texas is in the Bible belt so we're not politically correct, and intolerant of those practices.
A lot of the territory of the United States is heavily inbred since the vast majority of it was settled by relatively few people at a time when transportation was difficult. Marriage between first cousins was allowed because the alternative was not breeding at all. It was mostly a policy of necessity or mere pragmatism. It is also not so unusual for isolated rural populations around the world in general.

However, the cities have the luxury of looking down on such practices.
 

redrumloa

Active Member
Moderator
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Messages
14,014
Reaction score
2,037
A lot of the territory of the United States is heavily inbred since the vast majority of it was settled by relatively few people at a time when transportation was difficult.

That is not true. Inbreeding has mostly not been socially acceptable anywhere in the USA by god fearing people. The same cannot be said for the global elites that Progressives love so much.
 

FluffyMcDeath

Active Member
Member
Joined
May 17, 2005
Messages
12,132
Reaction score
2,624
That is not true. Inbreeding has mostly not been socially acceptable anywhere in the USA by god fearing people.
They didn't have a choice - well, they did - the choice was to die out. And you are wrong when you say that is untrue. God fearing people's morality is just as plastic and sometimes more so than non-God fearing people. However, the point is moot. Only the elites in the US were not god fearing. The majority of the population were god fearing (since it was the only socially acceptable norm) and they did marry first cousins.
 

FluffyMcDeath

Active Member
Member
Joined
May 17, 2005
Messages
12,132
Reaction score
2,624
As for the royals you are correct - that is political. However, the royals do not constitute the global elite like they used to. It's not that they aren't still involved, but there is much new money in the mix these days.
And progressives are not fond of any elites. Elitism is anti egalitarian. Progressives work for a leveler playing field but of course progressive is just the new slur for liberal - another good word stripped of meaning by morons.
 

faethor

Active Member
Moderator
Joined
Aug 25, 2005
Messages
5,144
Reaction score
1,243
That is not true. Inbreeding has mostly not been socially acceptable anywhere in the USA by god fearing people. The same cannot be said for the global elites that Progressives love so much.
This might help you. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cousin_marriage_law_in_the_United_States_by_state

As for your link do you not realize that European Aristocracy was exactly what that Progressive Jefferson was against and trying to avoid? That sort of activity is seen by the CEOs of corporations around not only the USA but the world.
 

metalman

Active Member
Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2005
Messages
10,232
Reaction score
3,006
That is not true. Inbreeding has mostly not been socially acceptable anywhere in the USA by god fearing people. The same cannot be said for the global elites that Progressives love so much.

Or Progressive Ivy league Professors

David Epstein, who specializes in American politics and voting rights, has taught at Harvard and Stanford and often is quoted by news organizations. He also has blogged on The Huffington Post.

"young relative" = daughter
 

metalman

Active Member
Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2005
Messages
10,232
Reaction score
3,006
Progressives work for a leveler playing field but of course progressive is just the new slur for liberal

Progressives picked the name to refer to themselves. Just like you can change the word used for shithouse, to the crapper, or the latrine, or the powder room, but after a while the meaning for all the new refined names becomes synonymous with shithouse.
 

FluffyMcDeath

Active Member
Member
Joined
May 17, 2005
Messages
12,132
Reaction score
2,624
Progressives picked the name to refer to themselves. Just like you can change the word used for shithouse, to the crapper, or the latrine, or the powder room, but after a while the meaning for all the new refined names becomes synonymous with shithouse.

Or propagandists can repeatedly say that kitchen means shithouse and pretty soon the dittoheads are all saying they're going to the kitchen to take a dump.
 
Top