Beastiality is a constitutional right!

[redrumloa]

Lawyers for donkey-sex suspect challenge law's constitutionality

Lawyers representing a Marion County man accused of sexual activity with a miniature donkey have filed a motion asking a judge to declare the Florida statute banning sexual activities with animals unconstitutional.
Carlos R. Romero, 32, declared last week that he wanted to take his case to trial. He is accused of sexual activities involving animals, a first-degree misdemeanor, after he allegedly was found in a compromising position in August with a female miniature donkey named Doodle.
In the motion filed in Marion County court on Dec. 6, the assistant public defenders handling Romero's case — Joshua Wyatt, Scott Schmidt and Joshua Lukman — wrote that the statute infringes upon Romero's due process rights and violates the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment in the U.S. Constitution.

 

[FluffyMcDeath]

Surely it's a form of speech, isn't it? Or is that only if you do it in public?

 

[metalman]

Many progressive transspecies people prefer goats or sheep.

Just don't try to stop me from having sex with sheep! :-D Or whatever the heck it is that *I* want to do.

​

 

[faethor]

Wouldn't this view be fairly typically a Libertarian stance? For example, Libertarians think the planet is here to do with as we will. The planet itself has no rights. I'd think they'd apply that same logic to animals. Animals don't get to own land or have any rights above people. Thus, for a Libertarian seeing an animal used whatever way makes that Libertarian the most happy would be a good thing.

 

[metalman]

"after he allegedly was found in a compromising position in August with a female miniature donkey named Doodle"

"miniature donkey" = "a little ass".

Zoophile Marriage ?

 

[cecilia]

I must be the only person that finds this creepy

best comment on that page:

Maybe this is more common than we think. Could be a acceptable explanation for the existence of Rick Scott.

 

[redrumloa]

Wouldn't this view be fairly typically a Libertarian stance? For example, Libertarians think the planet is here to do with as we will. The planet itself has no rights. I'd think they'd apply that same logic to animals. Animals don't get to own land or have any rights above people. Thus, for a Libertarian seeing an animal used whatever way makes that Libertarian the most happy would be a good thing.

What a strange world you live in and what a wierd stretch of the imagination. Zoophiles are the exclusive domain of the Democrat Party.

Abusing animals for perverse sexual pleasure is the exact same selfishness as sticking a vacuum tube up your twat and ripping a baby apart limb from limb for lazy convenience.

 

[FluffyMcDeath]

Many progressive transspecies people prefer goats or sheep.

Nice find. I can still stand by that post. It's also nice to see the database so well preserved. 2002 is 10 years ago already. Yeesh doesn't time fly - it was a different world back then (but we already knew what was coming).

 

[FluffyMcDeath]

What a strange world you live in and what a wierd stretch of the imagination. Zoophiles are the exclusive domain of the Democrat Party.

The Republican party is most vocal about how abhorrent homosexuality is and yet their ranks seem to boast a surprising number of closeted homosexuals (which becomes apparent as they are outed). Since they seem so fascinated with yelling about bestiality and pedophilia I'll bet you can find some of those types in the party too.

Abusing animals for perverse sexual pleasure is the exact same selfishness as sticking a vacuum tube up your twat and ripping a baby apart limb from limb for lazy convenience.

Really? A woman can't get pregnant on her own and if all the guys were shagging sheep instead abortions would disappear. That's the trouble with Republicans, they always hate the thing that would solve the other thing they hate. Plus they talk about liberty but want to control what "other people" can do with their lives when they aren't hurting anybody.

 

[FluffyMcDeath]

My favourite comment so far (in reply to someone who asked how you can get consent from a donkey) -

Did you get consent before you ate that turkey dinner?

 

[Speelgoedmannetje]

You can't just forbid things just because they're (very very very) yucky.
That would make jurisdiction very very subjective. Not something you want if you want your law system to be enforced and undebatable.
And breeders, don't they get in trouble then as well?

Besides, if the animal suffers, there are already laws against animal cruelty isn't there?

 

[Glaucus]

How else are you gonna make those European art films?

 

[Speelgoedmannetje]

My favourite comment so far (in reply to someone who asked how you can get consent from a donkey) -

.....

oooowkaaay...

 

[redrumloa]

Really? A woman can't get pregnant on her own and if all the guys were shagging sheep instead abortions would disappear. That's the trouble with Republicans, they always hate the thing that would solve the other thing they hate. Plus they talk about liberty but want to control what "other people" can do with their lives when they aren't hurting anybody.

You really are advocating f***ing animals? Wow.. Almost speechless.

I'm sure the animals consented

 

[Glaucus]

The Republican party is most vocal about how abhorrent homosexuality is and yet their ranks seem to boast a surprising number of closeted homosexuals (which becomes apparent as they are outed).

Loving a man is absolutely abhorrent. However, splitting a man's head in two from 5000 miles away, well that makes you a hero!

 

[redrumloa]

Loving a man is absolutely abhorrent. However, splitting a man's head in two from 5000 miles away, well that makes you a hero!

Who is against homosexuality? Which Whyzzat user exactly?

 

[Glaucus]

Who is against homosexuality? Which Whyzzat user exactly?

I wasn't referring to any particular member here. Fluffy made a comment about Republicans, party which has been partially been taken over by religious zealots.

 

[Speelgoedmannetje]

You really are advocating f***ing animals? Wow.. Almost speechless.

I'm sure the animals consented

I don't think animals consent when they're being bred for food, or being butchered. And arguing against laws is not the same as advocating the acts that these laws prohibit, that is not a kosher way of arguing Redrumloa.

 

[redrumloa]

There are religious zealots on both sides. Those Westboro Baptist church assholes are democrats. Don't forget Obama's own preacher and his "God damn America!". Besides, even many mainstream religions are warming up to homosexuals. Times are changing.

 

[minator]

I thought the Sudanese approach to this quite innovative:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/africa/4748292.stm