Wayne wrote:
Three weeks, three major Earthquakes. Anyone else want to rethink the idea of coincidence?
http://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/europe/03 ... tml?hpt=T2You know, the thing about Turkey is that the are always getting earthquakes and yet all their buildings are always falling down - and a 6 isn't really that big. Haiti's earthquake was about 100 times stronger and Chile's was 1000 time stronger. Chile builds for earthquakes because they know they are in an active region.
As to clusters... I'm not surprised though it still seems to be the established lore in the science that earthquakes are generally wholly separate events. In that they are unpredictable and you can't say when and where they are going to occur then it's true enough to say that but whenever you get a big quake it's plain to see from the seismic activity that it takes a while for the ringing to stop and all the stresses to settle out.
Each fault or plate boundary builds up it's own stresses over time and the closer they are to critical, the less perturbation it takes to set them off. A strong quake somewhere in the world could be enough to tip the scales, however, it's not cut and dried. At considerable distances local effects tend to be dominant, so immediate triggering isn't likely but as the relieved stress redistributes itself. It's like dropping sand grains onto a pile. Sometimes nothing happens, sometimes some sand slips, sometimes a lot.